Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()
From: J Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 09:34:03 -0700
Cc: zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterhuewe@xxxxxx, jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tpmdd@xxxxxxxxxxxx, jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, patrickc@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180507160733.8817-2-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0

  		do {
-			tpm_msleep(TPM_POLL_SLEEP);
+			tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL);

I'm just curious why it was decided to still use tpm_msleep() hereinstead of usleep_range() which was used in the 2nd patch.


Otherwise,

Acked-by: Jay Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@xxxxxxxxx>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()
  - From: Nayna Jain

References:
- [PATCH v3 0/2] tpm: improving granularity in poll sleep times
  - From: Nayna Jain
- [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()
  - From: Nayna Jain

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb: misc: xapea00x: perform platform initialization of TPM
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] tpm: reduce polling time to usecs for even finer granularity
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: reduce poll sleep time in tpm_transmit()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Kernel Hardening] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux