On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 01:35:33PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 10:06:15PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2b.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2b.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..c7726f2895aa > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2b.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > > +#ifndef _TPM2_TPM2B_H > > +#define _TPM2_TPM2B_H > > +/* > > + * Handing for tpm2b structures to facilitate the building of commands > > + */ > > + > > +#include "tpm.h" > > + > > +#include <asm/unaligned.h> > > + > > +struct tpm2b { > > + struct tpm_buf buf; > > +}; > > + > > +/* opaque structure, holds auth session parameters like the session key */ > > +struct tpm2_auth; > > + > > +static inline int tpm2b_init(struct tpm2b *buf) > > +{ > > + return tpm_buf_init(&buf->buf, 0, 0); > > +} > > + > > +static inline void tpm2b_reset(struct tpm2b *buf) > > +{ > > + struct tpm_input_header *head; > > + > > + head = (struct tpm_input_header *)buf->buf.data; > > + head->length = cpu_to_be32(sizeof(*head)); > > +} > > + > > +static inline void tpm2b_append(struct tpm2b *buf, const unsigned char *data, > > + unsigned int len) > > +{ > > + tpm_buf_append(&buf->buf, data, len); > > +} > > + > > +#define TPM2B_APPEND(type) \ > > + static inline void tpm2b_append_##type(struct tpm2b *buf, const type value) { tpm_buf_append_##type(&buf->buf, value); } > > + > > +TPM2B_APPEND(u8) > > +TPM2B_APPEND(u16) > > +TPM2B_APPEND(u32) > > + > > +static inline void *tpm2b_buffer(const struct tpm2b *buf) > > +{ > > + return buf->buf.data + sizeof(struct tpm_input_header); > > +} > > + > > +static inline u16 tpm2b_len(struct tpm2b *buf) > > +{ > > + return tpm_buf_length(&buf->buf) - sizeof(struct tpm_input_header); > > +} > > + > > +static inline void tpm2b_destroy(struct tpm2b *buf) > > +{ > > + tpm_buf_destroy(&buf->buf); > > +} > > + > > +static inline void tpm_buf_append_2b(struct tpm_buf *buf, struct tpm2b *tpm2b) > > +{ > > + u16 len = tpm2b_len(tpm2b); > > + > > + tpm_buf_append_u16(buf, len); > > + tpm_buf_append(buf, tpm2b_buffer(tpm2b), len); > > + /* clear the buf for reuse */ > > + tpm2b_reset(tpm2b); > > +} > > + > > +/* Macros for unmarshalling known size BE data */ > > +#define GET_INC(type) \ > > +static inline u##type get_inc_##type(const u8 **ptr) { \ > > + u##type val; \ > > + val = get_unaligned_be##type(*ptr); \ > > + *ptr += sizeof(val); \ > > + return val; \ > > +} > > + > > +GET_INC(16) > > +GET_INC(32) > > + > > +#endif > > -- > > 2.12.3 > > > > Some meta stuff: > > * Add me to TO-field because I should probably review and eventually > test these, right? > * CC to linux-security-module > * Why there is no RFC tag given that these are so quite large changes? > * Why in hell tpm2b.h? > > /Jarkko Some other large scale level stuff that I saw: * Do not document functions in the file header. * Make the stuff in the header (expect functio descriptions) as documentation block: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt If you don't want to do this, then just move the documentation to the commit message. I rather do not have the documentation at all in the files than have it in unmaintanable form. * Create structs for complex things that you add inside TPM commands and declare these helpers right before the function and add them with tpm_buf_append(). A good metric for this is when you see your self adding field names as a comment. This should make these patches a factor cleaner. We use this approach in some places such as tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(). * Please, oh please get rid of this tpm2b.h. It is a definitive NAK (OK I said it already above but cannot really over emphasize it). * Short summary should be "tpm: add encrypted and integrity protected sessions" or something along the lines. I guess this is enough for first review round? /Jarkko