Re: [PATCH 3/5] tpm: migrate tpm2_probe() to use struct tpm_buf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



.
.
.
I'm new to this area of the kernel, but I'm not getting these lines:

+	rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, buf.data, PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0, NULL);
+	tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
  	if (rc <  0)
Why is this if() check not directly after the tpm_transmit_cmd() call that sets rc?  Is it correct you want to destroy buf regardless of the tpm_transmit_cmd() outcome?
  		return rc;
-
-	if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
+	out = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data;

So buf has been destroyed, buf.data sill has something valid to assign to out?
+	if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
  		chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
return 0;
Thanks,
Jay



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux