On 03/01/2018 02:52 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 02:18:27PM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
In tpm_transmit, after send(), the code checks for status in a loop
Maybe cutting hairs now but please just use the actual function name
instead of send(). Just makes the commit log more useful asset.
Sure, will do.
- tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
+ tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT_POLL);
What about just calling schedule()?
I'm not sure what you mean by "schedule()". Are you suggesting instead
of using usleep_range(), using something with an even finer grain
construct?
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
/Jarkko
