On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 23:28 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:27:25PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:26:00PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:51:51PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 19:43 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I get merge conflicts in my tree but I'll review this. > > > > > > > > You told me to rebase it on that patch that wasn't in your > > > > tree: > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10208965/ > > > > > > > > If you put it in your tree, I can just rebase on top of > > > > everything. > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > Aah. Sorry, my bad I'll move forward on testing :-) > > > > > > /Jarkko > > > > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > /Jarkko > > These must be taken away: > > [ 2.843641] tpm tpm0: TPM: running incremental selftest > [ 2.854087] tpm tpm0: TPM: selftest succeeded I'm not wedded to having the messages, but it helps give context when something like this happens: [ 1.550099] tpm_tis MSFT0101:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0xFE, rev-id 2) [ 1.550108] tpm tpm0: TPM: running incremental selftest [ 1.602294] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (323) occurred incremental selftest [ 1.602320] tpm tpm0: TPM: incremental selftest failed [ 1.602322] tpm tpm0: TPM: running full selftest [ 2.523689] tpm tpm0: TPM: selftest succeeded It also helps explain why I lost a second in the boot sequence to the TPM having to run a full self test. Without the chatty messages, what you see is [ 1.550099] tpm_tis MSFT0101:00: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0xFE, rev-id 2) [ 1.602294] tpm tpm0: A TPM error (323) occurred incremental selftest Which is a bit harder to interpret. James
