Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] tpm-chip: Export TPM device to user space even when startup failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 08:45:10PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:

> For SGX code that I've been upstreaming to arch/x86 tree the feedback
> was that local variable declarations should be in line length order,
> which makes sense to me i.e. startup_succesful should be the first
> declaration.

AFAIK that 'reverse christmas tree' style particularly local to the
net tree, not a general kernel style guideline. We've never used it in
TPM for instance.

Jason



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux