> The correct solution should be something like tpm2_auto_startup > (execute selftests, if they fail because of the missing startup > command, execute that and retry the selftests). Interestingly, > tpm1_auto_startup (same purpose as tpm2_auto_startup, but for TPM 1.2 > instead) does not use the same sequence, the startup-retry part is > missing. Is there any reason this is done differently for TPM 1.2? > Otherwise I'd propose to make tpm1_auto_startup follow the same > sequence as tpm2_auto_startup and then call both from tpm_tis_resume, > similar to what tpm_chip_register does. I think the reason for that is that such regression has never reported on TPM 1.2 platform. No other reason. /Jarkko
