Re: IMA keyctl problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Instead of "appraise func=BPRM_CHECK fowner=0 appraise_type=imasig"
> the appraise rule would be "appraise func=BPRM_CHECK
> appraise_type=imasig".

Spot on, thank you!

I didn't have a func=* which was causing this entire mess. I changed
the rule from:

`appraise appraise_type=imasig uid=1000` to:
`appraise appraise_type=imasig func=BPRM_CHECK uid=1000`

All behaves exactly as expected. I now have this VM booting and doing
so with enforced IMA signatures. Neato, thanks!

Weird so much came out as what looked like a keyctl issue. Apologies
for focusing on that and not posting the policy file, It's not clear
exactly why this policy rule bug surfaced like that, but I think I'm
off with a baseline now.

Thanks a ton for the help!
  Paul

-- 
:wq



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux