Re: [PATCH v2] ima: log message to module appraisal error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04-12, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 18:23 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote:
> > Simple but useful message log to the user in case of module appraise is
> > forced and fails due to the lack of file descriptor, that might be
> > caused by kmod calls to compressed modules.
> []
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> []
> > @@ -366,8 +366,12 @@ int ima_read_file(struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id read_id)
> >  
> >  	if (!file && read_id == READING_MODULE) {
> >  		if (!sig_enforce && (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES) &&
> > -		    (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE))
> > +		    (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE)) {
> > +			pr_err("impossible to appraise a module without a file \
> > +			       descriptor. sig_enforce kernel parameter might \
> > +			       help\n");
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> You should probably use scripts/checkpatch.pl on your proposed
> patches
> before sending them.
> 
> You've got a lot of tabs and spaces after every line continuation.
> Please coalesce the format on a single line and avoid this defect.
> 
> 			pr_err("impossible to appraise a module without a file descriptor. sig_enforce kernel parameter might help\n");
> 

Oh gosh, sorry for that. You're right. I'll post a v3, changing to the
way you pointed, soon.

Thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux