On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 15:14 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote: > On 04-12, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 16:15 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I don't really know what are your best interest in update ima-evm-utils > > > 1.0 package to support OpenSSL 1.1 new interface considering lots of > > > distros are chaging to it as the default one. Some are maintaining > > > compatibility packages to OpenSSL 1.0, but usually it remains available > > > in the official repos for something like 1 or 2 releases and then > > > removed completely. > > > > > > Actually I have a simple/small port of it to OpenSSL 1.1 that I plan to > > > maintain for Fedora's Rawhide (next release, f28) package. Do you guys > > > have interest on it? I could post it as a patch. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Yes, I'd really appreciate it. We need to release the new EVM > > portable signature support as well. > > > > Perfect! should I post with some different subject prefix or something > like that to let things clear that is a patch for the userspace app? In general, now that we have a shared mailing list with TPM, the subject line should be prefixed with the kernel subystem (eg. "ima:", "evm:", "tpm:"). Similarly we could do the equivalent for userspace applications (eg. "ima-evm-utils:"). Jarkko, is that ok? Mimi
