On 11/26/2017 03:21 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:25:29PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> That was my interpretation as well and what I was arguing about. I'm glad to >> know that you also think the same. > > It could be that this rationale has been your earlier emails but > I just haven't recognized it :-) I think I'm starting to buy this. > No worries, Philip did a much better work than I did at explaining the issue. In fact, at the beginning I also thought that was an user-space problem until he explained to me that the problem was in the kernel. > I don't have any fixed standing points anything basically. It is > just better to be really resistant with anything that is related > to user-kernel interaction until you really get it... > And I really appreciate. It's much better to go back and forth on patches than having an unstable interface that causes regressions between kernel releases. I've posted a v2 that addressed Philip's comments. Hopefully this should be in a good shape now. > /Jarkko > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Software Engineer - Desktop Hardware Enablement Red Hat
