On 11/21/2017 10:07 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 11/21/2017 12:15 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> matters less than breaking the sandbox. >> > > Yes, sorry for that. It wasn't clear to me that there was a sandbox and my > lack of familiarity with the code was the reason why I posted as a RFC in > the first place. > > Do you agree with Jason's suggestion to send a synthesized TPM command in > the that the command isn't supported? > Sorry, this should had been: send a synthesized TPM response in the case that the command isn't supported. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Software Engineer - Desktop Hardware Enablement Red Hat
