On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > -#define SECURITY_NAME_MAX 10 > > > > +#define SECURITY_NAME_MAX 15 > > > > > > Should this small hunk be a separate atomic patch? > > > > I thought about it, but this is the first and only LSM with a larger > > name. > > Maybe the commit log should mention that then. Actually, make it a separate patch, so we can easily pinpoint the commit. -- James Morris <james.l.morris@xxxxxxxxxx>
