Re: [RFC PATCH] ima: require secure_boot rules in lockdown mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Mimi Zohar wrote:

> Thank you for the clarification (and patience).  There are a lot of
> interactions between the integrity subsystem and the other security
> subsystems, especially the TPM.  Assuming it is acceptable, as you
> said, I'd really prefer continuing to have the integrity subsystem
> merged via the security tree.

That's fine, whatever works for you.


-- 
James Morris
<james.l.morris@xxxxxxxxxx>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux