On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 03:18:48PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> > Since this may conflict with the last patch set I sent, are you happy >> > for me to base this new set on tpmdd/master? >> >> What about this: you do an updated version of your patch set that >> includes these clean ups? >> >> PS. Sorry for slowness with your patches. I've just had a lot of stuff >> going on lately. They are 2nd in my priority queue right after >> CVE-2017-15361. > > This is an awful idea as your patch is in great shape and we want to > land that feature ASAP. Lets land your patches first and then plan how > to do the clean up. > > I have some other suggestions for the clean up work that require even > more work. Mainly: I think it would make sense to have an eventlog > subdirectory for the eventlog as it's growing so complex. > > What do you think? Yes, I would prefer this option as well. Also, agreed on a subdirectory. > > /Jarkko
