> The TPM burstcount status indicates the number of bytes that can > be sent to the TPM without causing bus wait states. Effectively, > it is the number of empty bytes in the command FIFO. > > This patch optimizes the tpm_tis_send_data() function by checking > the burstcount only once. And if the burstcount is valid, it writes > all the bytes at once, permitting wait state. > > After this change, performance on a TPM 1.2 with an 8 byte > burstcount for 1000 extends improved from ~41sec to ~14sec. > > Suggested-by: Ken Goldman <kgold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in > conjunction with the TPM Device Driver work group. > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 42 +++++++++++++++---------------------- > ---- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c > index b33126a35694..993328ae988c 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c > @@ -316,7 +316,6 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, > u8 *buf, size_t len) > { > struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev); > int rc, status, burstcnt; > - size_t count = 0; > bool itpm = priv->flags & TPM_TIS_ITPM_WORKAROUND; > > status = tpm_tis_status(chip); > @@ -330,35 +329,24 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, > u8 *buf, size_t len) > } > } > > - while (count < len - 1) { > - burstcnt = get_burstcount(chip); > - if (burstcnt < 0) { > - dev_err(&chip->dev, "Unable to read burstcount\n"); > - rc = burstcnt; > - goto out_err; > - } > - burstcnt = min_t(int, burstcnt, len - count - 1); > - rc = tpm_tis_write_bytes(priv, TPM_DATA_FIFO(priv- > >locality), > - burstcnt, buf + count); > - if (rc < 0) > - goto out_err; > - > - count += burstcnt; > - > - if (wait_for_tpm_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, chip- > >timeout_c, > - &priv->int_queue, false) < 0) { > - rc = -ETIME; > - goto out_err; > - } > - status = tpm_tis_status(chip); > - if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) == 0) { > - rc = -EIO; > - goto out_err; > - } > + /* > + * Get the initial burstcount to ensure TPM is ready to > + * accept data. > + */ > + burstcnt = get_burstcount(chip); > + if (burstcnt < 0) { > + dev_err(&chip->dev, "Unable to read burstcount\n"); > + rc = burstcnt; > + goto out_err; > } > > + rc = tpm_tis_write_bytes(priv, TPM_DATA_FIFO(priv->locality), > + len - 1, buf); > + if (rc < 0) > + goto out_err; > + > /* write last byte */ > - rc = tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_DATA_FIFO(priv->locality), > buf[count]); > + rc = tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_DATA_FIFO(priv->locality), buf[len- > 1]); > if (rc < 0) > goto out_err; > > -- > 2.13.3 This seems to fail reliably with my SPI TPM 2.0. I get EIO when trying to send large amounts of data, e.g. with TPM2_Hash, and subsequent tests seem to take an unusual amount of time. More analysis probably has to wait until November, since I am going to be in Prague next week. Alexander