Re: [PATCH] EVM: Add support for portable signature format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Dmitry Kasatkin
<dmitry.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> New files won't have EVM signatures. Appraisal will only be performed
>> on executables that are running in a privileged security context.
>
> This patch was there for 3 years to enable policy to require evm
> digital signatures.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kasatkin/linux-digsig.git/commit/?h=evm-next&id=580e1ad19dd9917ce8ca5edbdf823c30397ccd47
>
> I was running a system where certain (privileged) components were
> required to use evm signatures.
>
> Before initramfs supported xattrs, we were running from rootfs /init
> and some binaries with EVM signature required. HMAC key was unsealed
> and initalized during this process.
> Now it is also possible to use external initramfs with xattrs and
> require evm digsigs.
>
> you are basically doing the same.

Broadly, but for our case we can't permit the local system to possess
a key that can create valid signatures, which means enhancing support
for portable asymmetric signatures.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Kernel Hardening]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux