On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:01:51AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:57 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:47:06AM -0700, Peter Huewe wrote: > > > Am 15. September 2017 10:40:14 GMT-07:00 schrieb Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > As the individual maintainers are different for the two sections, > > > > I think you need both entries. > > > > > > Try to get a hold of ashley and ask whether she is actively maintaining. > > > > > > While updating Maintainers I vote for removing Marcel Selhorst for tpm. > > > > > > You can keep me for now :) > > > Peter > > > > During the last bit less than couple of years I've been maintaining > > TPM and a bit less than four years I've been contributing I've never > > heard anything of Ashley. > > > > What is the expiration time? > > There is no fixed time at all. > Generally when the email bounces or when the maintainer resigns. > (involuntarily or not...) > > It seems a couple years since Ashley signed anything and five years > since Marcel Selhorst signed anything. > > It's polite to add a CREDITS entry when removing inactive maintainers. The file ends: " # Don't add your name here, unless you really _are_ after Marc # alphabetically. Leonard used to be very proud of being the # last entry, and he'll get positively pissed if he can't even # be second-to-last. (and this file really _is_ supposed to be # in alphabetic order) " So where do I should add?-) /Jarkko
