On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 05:26:22PM +0100, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
> GPIO controller often have support for IRQ: allow to easily allocate
> both gpio-regmap and regmap-irq in one operation.
...
> - if (config->irq_domain) {
> - ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add_domain(chip, config->irq_domain);
> + irq_domain = config->irq_domain;
Better to move it into #else, so we avoid double assignment (see below).
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
> + if (config->regmap_irq_chip) {
> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data;
> +
> + ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip_fwnode(config->parent, dev_fwnode(config->parent),
> + config->regmap, config->regmap_irq_irqno,
> + config->regmap_irq_flags, 0,
> + config->regmap_irq_chip, &irq_chip_data);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_gpio;
> +
> + irq_domain = regmap_irq_get_domain(irq_chip_data);
> + if (config->regmap_irq_chip_data)
> + *config->regmap_irq_chip_data = irq_chip_data;
Hmm... I was under impression that we don't need this to be returned.
Do we have any user of it right now? If not, no need to export until
it is needed.
> + }
} else
> +#endif
irq_domain = config->irq_domain;
> +
> + if (irq_domain) {
> + ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add_domain(chip, irq_domain);
> if (ret)
> goto err_remove_gpiochip;
> }
...
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
> + struct regmap_irq_chip *regmap_irq_chip;
> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data **regmap_irq_chip_data;
But why double pointer?
> + int regmap_irq_irqno;
> + unsigned long regmap_irq_flags;
> +#endif
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
