On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:55:36PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:40:55PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 05:34:49PM +0100, Manuel Traut wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 06:49:00AM +0100, Markus Burri wrote: > > > > The delay is retrieved from a device-tree property, so the duration is > > > > variable. fsleep guesses the best delay function based on duration. > > > > > > > > see Documentation/timers/delay_sleep_functions.rst > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Burri <markus.burri@xxxxxx> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Manuel Traut <manuel.traut@xxxxxx> > > > > As I mentioned in other review activate_col() may be called in atomic > > context where we can not sleep: > > > > "activate_col() may be called in atomic context, and if fsleep() turns > > into usleep_range() or msleep() we are going to have a bad time. > > > > We should either stop using request_any_context_irq() or figure out if > > interrupt handler can sleep or not and adjust behavior properly." > > > > Unfortunately this was completely ignored. > > My apologies, it looks like it only is called from work handler, so my > comment was wrong. > > Thanks. Yes sorry to ignore, it is only called in work handler > > -- > Dmitry
