On Thu Dec 19, 2024 at 10:53 PM CET, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 05:21:21PM +0100, mathieu.dubois-briand@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + max7360_pwm = to_max7360_pwm(chip);
> > + ret = regmap_write_bits(max7360_pwm->regmap, MAX7360_REG_GPIOCTRL,
> > + MAX7360_PWM_CTRL_ENABLE(pwm->hwpwm),
> > + MAX7360_PWM_CTRL_ENABLE(pwm->hwpwm));
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&chip->dev, "failed to enable pwm-%d , error %d\n",
> > + pwm->hwpwm, ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + do_div(duty_steps, MAX7360_PWM_PERIOD_NS);
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_write(max7360_pwm->regmap, MAX7360_REG_PWMBASE + pwm->hwpwm,
> > + duty_steps >= 255 ? 255 : duty_steps);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&chip->dev,
> > + "failed to apply pwm duty_cycle %llu on pwm-%d, error %d\n",
> > + duty_steps, pwm->hwpwm, ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
>
> Huh, state->period isn't used at all. That is wrong for sure.
>
Yes this was definitely missing. Period is fixed by the chip, so I will
make sure the requested one is valid or return -EINVAL.
Thanks a lot for your review, I am preparing a new version of this
series that should address all your comments.
--
Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
