Hi Jiri,
Am Donnerstag, 7. November 2024, 13:59:04 CET schrieb Jiri Kosina:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2024, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>
> > The hid-sensor-hub creates the individual device structs and transfers them
> > to the created mfd platform-devices via the platform_data in the mfd_cell.
> >
> > Before e651a1da442a ("HID: hid-sensor-hub: Allow parallel synchronous reads")
> > the sensor-hub was managing access centrally, with one "completion" in the
> > hub's data structure, which needed to be finished on removal at the latest.
> >
> > The mentioned commit then moved this central management to each hid sensor
> > device, resulting on a completion in each struct hid_sensor_hub_device.
> > The remove procedure was adapted to go through all sensor devices and
> > finish any pending "completion".
> >
> > What this didn't take into account was, platform_device_add_data() that is
> > used by mfd_add{_hotplug}_devices() does a kmemdup on the submitted
> > platform-data. So the data the platform-device gets is a copy of the
> > original data, meaning that the device worked on a different completion
> > than what sensor_hub_remove() currently wants to access.
> >
> > To fix that, use device_for_each_child() to go through each child-device
> > similar to how mfd_remove_devices() unregisters the devices later and
> > with that get the live platform_data to finalize the correct completion.
> >
> > Fixes: e651a1da442a ("HID: hid-sensor-hub: Allow parallel synchronous reads")
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Are you planning to merge this together with the rest of the set, or do
> you want me to expedite it? I'll be happy to apply it separately as a
> proper fix.
This change was more or less a surprise find, because I wanted to make
the platform_data pointer in the mfd_cell struct const and this the hid
sensor hub stood out as doing something strange ;-) .
So patch 2 of this series actually depends on this change to not cause
build errors.
But seeing that we're after -rc6 alredy, I would assume the brunt of the
mcu series might need to wait after 6.13-rc1 anyway - but I guess that
depends on how Lee sees things ;-) .
Heiko
