Am Fri, 4 Oct 2024 12:41:23 +0300 schrieb Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() will soon be changed to include a call to > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). This patch switches the current users to > __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() which will continue to have the > functionality of old pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(). > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/input/keyboard/omap4-keypad.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/omap4-keypad.c > b/drivers/input/keyboard/omap4-keypad.c index > 040b340995d8..cc8d77601fc7 100644 --- > a/drivers/input/keyboard/omap4-keypad.c +++ > b/drivers/input/keyboard/omap4-keypad.c @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static > irqreturn_t omap4_keypad_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id) > kbd_read_irqreg(keypad_data, OMAP4_KBD_IRQSTATUS)); > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev); > - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev); > + __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev); > > return IRQ_HANDLED; > } > @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int omap4_keypad_open(struct input_dev > *input) > out: > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev); > - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev); > + __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev); > hmm, if pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() will include the call to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(), then why is this change needed? After the change, the mark_last_busy could be removed. Regards, Andreas
