On Mon, Aug 26, 2024, at 08:52, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 6:02 PM Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I'm glad that we agree that we do not want the elaborate merge process
>> and instead push the changes through one tree in one shot we just need
>> to decide which one - soc or input. I am fine with using either.
>
> I'm also fine with either, but let's take the input tree because the
> you're in direct control of it so it will be easier.
Sorry I dropped the ball here, I just saw that these five patches
are still in the patchwork waiting for me to apply them.
I'm also happy for them to go through the input tree, and have
marked them as not-for-us in patchwork now. Dmitry, please add
my
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
and pick them up in your tree. I've checked that there are no
conflicts against contents of the SoC tree. If you prefer me to
pick them up after all, that is also fine, but please resend in
that case.
Arnd
