On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 9:11 AM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 28/08/2024 14:51, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> > Hi Hans
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 10:14 AM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Erling Ljunggren <hljunggr@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Add capability flag to indicate that the device is an EDID-only device.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Erling Ljunggren <hljunggr@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
> >> index 4e91362da6da..987c821aed79 100644
> >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
> >> @@ -502,6 +502,7 @@ struct v4l2_capability {
> >> #define V4L2_CAP_META_CAPTURE 0x00800000 /* Is a metadata capture device */
> >>
> >> #define V4L2_CAP_READWRITE 0x01000000 /* read/write systemcalls */
> >> +#define V4L2_CAP_EDID 0x02000000 /* Is an EDID-only device */
> >
> > Would it make sense to add a check for "EDID-only", I mean, if the
> > driver sets this cap, then it should not set V4L2_CAP_STREAMING or others.
> >
> > The test could be in the core or even in v4l2-compliance.
>
> Good point. It is easy to add this to v4l2-compliance.
>
> I noticed that the v4l2 core doesn't check for invalid caps combinations. It is
> left to v4l2-compliance to check that. So I think I'll keep the check there.
cool! Thanks
Reviewed-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> >
> > Regards!
> >
> >
> >> #define V4L2_CAP_STREAMING 0x04000000 /* streaming I/O ioctls */
> >> #define V4L2_CAP_META_OUTPUT 0x08000000 /* Is a metadata output device */
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.43.0
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ricardo Ribalda
> >
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
