Hi Luke, On Jun 24 2024, Luke D. Jones wrote: > - Fix missing braces around initializer > - Remove unused function declaration from asus-wmi.h > > Signed-off-by: Luke D. Jones <luke@xxxxxxxxxx> You are missing Reported-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> to give credits where it's due and also a link to the report: Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZnQ03jc-xEWam2cR@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ The subject formatting is also wrong. > --- > include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h | 11 +---------- That's weird. That file shouldn't be touched from us (on the HID side) without the ack from Hans or the platform x86 people. And bda38f9a41 ("HID: asus: use hid for brightness...) doesn't have such an ack. This got me realize that the initial patch was incorrectly taken through the hid tree: in [1] Hans explicitely asked to take the patch through his tree. So I'm going to drop your patch from the HID tree and ask you to resubmit the entire patch as a v3 to the platform guys. Cheers, Benjamin [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/b0d8eebc-5abb-4ec0-898c-af7eedc730d9@xxxxxxxxxx/ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h b/include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h > index 96c780efa0d7..74b32e1d6735 100644 > --- a/include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h > +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h > @@ -162,15 +162,6 @@ static inline int asus_wmi_evaluate_method(u32 method_id, u32 arg0, u32 arg1, > #endif > > /* To be used by both hid-asus and asus-wmi to determine which controls kbd_brightness */ > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ASUS_WMI) > -bool asus_use_hid_led(void); > -#else > -static inline bool asus_use_hid_led(void) > -{ > - return true; > -} > -#endif > - > static const struct dmi_system_id asus_use_hid_led_dmi_ids[] = { > { > .matches = { > @@ -202,7 +193,7 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id asus_use_hid_led_dmi_ids[] = { > DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "RC71L"), > }, > }, > - NULL, > + { }, > }; > > #endif /* __PLATFORM_DATA_X86_ASUS_WMI_H */ > -- > 2.45.2 >
