On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 09:51:42AM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote: > [...] If you don't like the idea of introducing non-actionable > warnings, would you be open to a small cleanup patch instead (see > attached as an example)? There's no particularly good reason to split > string generation across calls to strscpy and strlcat when a single > call to snprintf would do, and snprintf is not __must_check on any of > the kernels we backport to. Yes, I actually like it much better, applied. Thanks. -- Dmitry
