On Tue, May 28, 2024, at 13:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> for (i = 0; i < fragment->fragment_cnt && offset < ish_fw->size; i++)
> {
> dma_bufs[i] = dma_alloc_coherent(dev->devc, fragment_size,
> &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> + dma_bufs[i] = dma_alloc_coherent(dev->devc, fragment_size,
> + &dma, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!dma_bufs[i])
> return -ENOMEM;
>
Sorry about this one, the duplicate linen was an incorrect
rebase. I've fixed this one locally but did not resend the
series since I'm still waiting for other review comments.
Arnd
