On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 20:21:19 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 7:28 PM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:13:45 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 1:20 AM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > @@ -1484,6 +1484,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id edt_ft5x06_of_match[] = {
> > > > { .compatible = "edt,edt-ft5206", .data = &edt_ft5x06_data },
> > > > { .compatible = "edt,edt-ft5306", .data = &edt_ft5x06_data },
> > > > { .compatible = "edt,edt-ft5406", .data = &edt_ft5x06_data },
> > > > + { .compatible = "focaltech,ft5426", .data = &edt_ft5506_data },
> > >
> > > Why a different vendor prefix?
> > > In case you need to use this one, keep the list sorted, currently this
> > > splits the edt,* ones.
> > >
> > How do I know whether to use evervision or edt instead?
>
> Ask DT people, the vendor-prefixes lists both...
>
> > I sorted by the numbers. Looking at datasheets for other controllers I see
> > https://www.displayfuture.com/Display/datasheet/controller/FT5x06.pdf
> > it only mentions FocalTech Systems Co., Ltd.
>
> But does the driver use that? AFAICS it uses edt. Perhaps it's due to
> a business split, not to my knowledge anyway.
>
Well, lets cite edt-ft5x06.rst:
"The edt-ft5x06 driver is useful for the EDT "Polytouch" family of capacitive
touch screens. Note that it is *not* suitable for other devices based on the
focaltec ft5x06 devices, since they contain vendor-specific firmware. In
particular this driver is not suitable for the Nook tablet."
So chips from focaltech which can be equipped with different firmware? So
edt prefix means EDT firmware?
Looking around I found this:
if (tsdata->version == EV_FT)
swap(x, y);
...
case 0x59: /* Evervision Display with FT5xx6 TS */
tsdata->version = EV_FT;
I need swap(x.y), I am using touchscreen-swapped-x-y property now.
So evervision prefix?
Regards,
Andreas
