On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 11:32, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay
<devnull+quic_fenglinw.quicinc.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The output voltage is inclusive hence the max level calculation is
> off-by-one-step. Correct it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Fixes tag?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> index 04cb87efd799..89f0f1c810d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
>
> #define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV (3100)
> #define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV (1200)
> -#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV)
> +#define VIB_PER_STEP_mV (100)
> +#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV + VIB_PER_STEP_mV)
>
> #define MAX_FF_SPEED 0xff
>
> @@ -118,10 +119,10 @@ static void pm8xxx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> vib->active = true;
> vib->level = ((VIB_MAX_LEVELS * vib->speed) / MAX_FF_SPEED) +
> VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV;
> - vib->level /= 100;
> + vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
> } else {
> vib->active = false;
> - vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / 100;
> + vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
> }
>
> pm8xxx_vib_set(vib, vib->active);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
