On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 01:46:56PM +0800, Allen Lin wrote: > Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2024年3月23日 週六 上午2:34寫道： > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 01:30:09PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 05:54:08PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 04:56:03PM +0800, Allen_Lin wrote: > > > > > Add the HX83102j touchscreen device tree bindings documents. > > > > > HX83102j is a Himax TDDI touchscreen controller. > > > > > It's power sequence should be bound with a lcm driver, thus it > > > > > needs to be a panel follower. Others are the same as normal SPI > > > > > touchscreen controller. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Allen_Lin <allencl_lin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > note to self/Krzysztof/Rob: > > > > There was a previous attempt at this kind of device. This version looks > > > > better but might be incomplete given there's a bunch more properties in > > > > that patchset: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017091900.801989-1-tylor_yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > Those don't look like properties we want coming back. > > > > Oh, I don't want most of them coming back either. There are some > > supplies in there though that I think we would like to come back, no? > > Maybe this particular device doesn't have any supplies, but that doesn't > > really seem credible. > > We will use Firmware-name in Device Tree. > For power supply settings, because there may be other device using > same regulator. If there are other devices using the same regulator is it more important that you document it so that it doesn't get disabled by the other users. > We plan to define it as an optional property for user to control in > next release. I don't see how the regulator would not be required, the device doesn't function without power. Thanks, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
