On Wed, 28 Feb 2024, Basavaraj Natikar wrote:
> This patch is to fix below build error while using the kconfig without
> x86.
>
> drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c: In function 'amd_mp2_pci_probe':
> drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c:413:21: error: 'boot_cpu_data'
> undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'boot_cpu_hwid'?
> 413 | if (boot_cpu_data.x86 >= 0x1A)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | boot_cpu_hwid
>
> Fixes: 6296562f30b1 ("HID: amd_sfh: Extend MP2 register access to SFH")
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240228145648.41c493ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c
> index 9e97c26c4482..c815f2f54321 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_pcie.c
> @@ -410,8 +410,10 @@ static int amd_mp2_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *i
>
> privdata->sfh1_1_ops = (const struct amd_sfh1_1_ops *)id->driver_data;
> if (privdata->sfh1_1_ops) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> if (boot_cpu_data.x86 >= 0x1A)
> privdata->rver = 1;
> +#endif
Does it even make sense to build this driver outside of x86 architecture?
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
