On Thu, 4 Jan 2024, Hans de Goede wrote: > > I am yet to submit the patches that uses the new SFH interfaces > > defined in this series. > > > > The suggestion from Hans is to have the SFH changes landed > > independently, so that Hans can take the PMF changes alone later > > during the rc's as fix. IMO, we can have this series merged first alone. > > > > But I am OK to have both PMF and SFH changes together. > > > > Hans, what is your feedback for Jiri's question? > > Jiri, originally the drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/ changes > were posted as part of this series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20231204101548.1458499-1-Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx/ > > specifically in these patches: > > https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20231204101548.1458499-14-Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx/ > https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20231204101548.1458499-15-Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx/ > https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20231204101548.1458499-16-Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx/ > > Where the last 2 patches introduce both the HID changes and the drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/... > consumer of the HID changes in one go. > > I have asked Shyam to split out the HID changes: > https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/ad064333-48a4-4cfa-9428-69e8a7c44667@xxxxxxxxxx/ [ ... snip ... ] Thanks a lot to both of you for the background. I have now queued the 3 HID patches in hid.git#for-6.8/amd-sfh -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
