Re: [PATCH 2/3] Input: da9063 - Use dev_err_probe()

[Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>]

On December 12, 2023 8:28:45 PM GMT+11:00, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hi Biju,
>
>On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:03 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 5:57 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Replace dev_err()->dev_err_probe() to simpilfy probe().
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> OK, I will send
>>
>> 1) separate patch for dropping unneeded prints related to OOM
>> 2) A patch for replacing dev_err()->dev_err_probe() + Update error message for devm_request_threaded_irq()
>> 3) separate patch for dropping print message for input_register_device();
>>
>> Is it ok?
>
>Personally, I'd be fine with just a single "cleanup error printing" patch.
>But Dmitry has the final say.

I'm fine with a single patch unless you feel strongly about splitting it in 2.

Thanks. 

-- 
Dmitry