Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Thanks for the feedback.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 11:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.1 0/8] Convert DA906{1,2} bindings to json-schema
>
> On 04/12/2023 18:25, Biju Das wrote:
> > Convert the below bindings to json-schema
> > 1) DA906{1,2} mfd bindings
> > 2) DA906{1,2,3} onkey bindings
> > 3) DA906{1,2,3} thermal bindings
> >
> > Also add fallback for DA9061 watchdog device and document
> > DA9063 watchdog device.
> >
> > v3->v3.1:
> > * Patch#1 is merge of patch#1 from v2 + patch#8 from v2.
> > * Dropped comment for d9061 watchdog fallback
> > * Replaced enum->const for dlg,da9061-watchdog and its fallback.
> > * Restored patch#4 in series 1 and dropped the thermal example
> > * Added Ack from Conor Dooley for da9063 watchdog binding support.
> > * Updated title DA9062/61->DA906{1,2,3} as it supports DA9063.
> > * Retained Rb tag since the changes are trivial.
> > * Added Ack from Conor for updating watchdog property
> > * Dropped link to product information.
> > * Patch#5(onkey) is squashed with patch#6 and patch#9 from v2.
> > * Replaced enum->const for dlg,da9061-onkey and its fallback.
> > * Dropped example
> > * Restored the thermal binding patch from v2.
> > * Dropped example
> > * Replaced enum->const for compatible property.
> > * Added Rb tag from Rob and retained Rb tag as changes are trivial.
> > * Added Ack from Conor Dooley for patch#7.
> > * Split the thermal binding patch separate
> > * Updated the description
>
>
> Hundreds of changes and just "3 -> 3.1"? This does not make sense.
Bot reported some issues with v2. So immediately I send v3 which clashed
with review comments from Conor and Rob.
No one has reviewed V3.
V3.1 = basically Review comments from v2 + Fix for Bot errors.
>
> Also, use normal versioning:
>
> b4 diff '<20231204172510.35041-9-biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>'
> Grabbing thread from
> lore.kernel.org/all/20231204172510.35041-9-
> biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/t.mbox.gz
> ---
> Analyzing 21 messages in the thread
> ERROR: Could not auto-find previous revision
> Run "b4 am -T" manually, then "b4 diff -m mbx1 mbx2"
Can you please clarify more? I may be missing something here?
I just rebase to linux-next and send patches using the command
git send-email --dry-run --annotate *.patch
All patches Updated with TO and CC recipients.
Am I missing anything here w.r.to versioning?
Cheers,
Biju
