* Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> [231125 04:50]: > Hi Tony, > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:32:41AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > + /* > > + * Wakeirq shares the handler with the main interrupt, it's only > > + * active during system suspend. See gpio_keys_button_enable_wakeup() > > + * and gpio_keys_button_disable_wakeup(). > > + */ > > + error = devm_request_any_context_irq(dev, bdata->wakeirq, isr, > > + irqflags, wakedesc, bdata); > > + if (error < 0) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Unable to claim wakeirq %d; error %d\n", > > + bdata->irq, error); > > + return error; > > + } > > + > > + /* > > + * Disable wakeirq until suspend. IRQF_NO_AUTOEN won't work if > > + * IRQF_SHARED was set based on !button->can_disable. > > + */ > > + disable_irq_nosync(bdata->wakeirq); > > Why _nosync() here and below? Is there any harm in sing the normal > variant? Well they are enabled the same time anyways for a while, so I see no harm using the normal variant here. Will post updated patches after some testing. Regards, Tony