On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 02:53:17PM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 21.11.23 14:09, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 09:11:42PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > > <snip>... > > There's no reply from culprit author nor linux-input people (did they > > miss this regression?). > > I guess part of the problem is that Bastien got reassigned and might not > care about the kernel anymore. > > Another part of it is that Jiri was CCed, but Benjamin was not. > > Ideally of course Mavroudis Chatzilazaridis, the culprit's author would > look into this, but from a quick search on lore it looks like Mavroudis > is not a regular kernel contributor and thus might not even know how we > expect situations like this to be handled. > > > And on Bugzilla, other reporters replied that > > reverting the culprit fixed the regression. > > From Takashi's comments like > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218094#c33 it sounds like > this can be fixed by resolving another regression as discussed earlier > today here: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/87edgjo2kr.wl-tiwai@xxxxxxx/ > > I think that might be the better solution, but Takashi, Hans, or the > input people will know best. > > > FYI, there's similar Bugzilla report on [1]. > > [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218172 > > Not sure, that might be a different problem, guess Hans is the best to > judge. > > > Also Cc'ed Linus. > > Linus can speak for himself, but I guess he gets enough mail already. > I'd say in a situation like this it thus might best to not CC him; > instead poke me when things apparently are not handled well, then we > together can decide if it's worth bringing Linus in. Thanks for the pro tip! -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
