On 11/8/23 20:53, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 9:57 AM Jiri Valek - 2N <jiriv@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Separate IRQ parsing is not necessary, I2C core do the job.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Valek - 2N <jiriv@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/input/keyboard/cap11xx.c | 10 ++--------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cap11xx.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/cap11xx.c
>> index 4711ea985627..ccca9936ef25 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/cap11xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/cap11xx.c
>> @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static int cap11xx_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c_client)
>> struct device *dev = &i2c_client->dev;
>> struct cap11xx_priv *priv;
>> const struct cap11xx_hw_model *cap;
>> - int i, error, irq;
>> + int i, error;
>> unsigned int val, rev;
>>
>> if (id->driver_data >= ARRAY_SIZE(cap11xx_devices)) {
>> @@ -624,13 +624,7 @@ static int cap11xx_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c_client)
>> if (error)
>> return error;
>>
>> - irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dev->of_node, 0);
>
> Probably can drop the include of of_irq.h as well.
Ack. Thanks for notice!
