On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 03:56:25PM +0800, yang tylor wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:09 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 05:31:29PM +0800, yang tylor wrote: > > > The behavior of "himax,boot_time_fw_upgrade" seems not stable and > > > should be removed. "himax,fw_in_flash", I use the kernel config for > > > user to select. > > > > That seems like a bad idea, we want to be able to build one kernel that > > works for all hardware at the same time. > > > I see, so I should take that back? > I'll explain more about it. Are there particular ICs where the firmware would always be in flash and others where it would never be? Or is this a choice made by the board or system designer? Thanks, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
