The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/input/misc/wistron_btns.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/wistron_btns.c b/drivers/input/misc/wistron_btns.c
index 111cb70cde46..5c4956678cd0 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/wistron_btns.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/wistron_btns.c
@@ -1286,13 +1286,11 @@ static int wistron_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
return 0;
}
-static int wistron_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
+static void wistron_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
{
wistron_led_remove();
input_unregister_device(wistron_idev);
bios_detach();
-
- return 0;
}
static int wistron_suspend(struct device *dev)
@@ -1336,7 +1334,7 @@ static struct platform_driver wistron_driver = {
.pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&wistron_pm_ops),
},
.probe = wistron_probe,
- .remove = wistron_remove,
+ .remove_new = wistron_remove,
};
static int __init wb_module_init(void)
--
2.40.1
