Re: [PATCH v4 03/38] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom-pm8xxx: allow using interrupts-extended

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/08/2023 14:57, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:

>>>>>>
>>>>>> The entire patch is not needed. At least should not be needed. What
>>>>>> problem are you trying to solve here?
>>>>>
>>>>> The main problem is the next chunk, which (currently) explicitly
>>>>> requires `interrupts' property. My goal is to allow
>>>>> `interrupts-extended' in addition to `interrupts'.
>>>>
>>>> They are allowed. Why do you think they aren't? That's why I don't
>>>> understand what real problem is here.
>>>
>>> qcom-pm8xxx.yaml lists `interrupts' property under the `required'
>>> clause. So I can not simply replace it with `interrupts-extended'
>>
>> Since when? So again: The entire patch is not needed.
> 
> Hmm, interesting. I'm pretty sure that I saw the issue, but now I can
> no longer reproduce it. Maybe I misinterpreted some other warning
> which I saw while this was WIP.
> I see that it is handled by the `fixup_interrupts` in dtschema itself.

If interrupts were brought by some other schema and that one did not
evaluate, then you could see errors about interrupt-extended. But that's
not the case here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux