Hi Rahul, On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 08:57:41AM -0700, Rahul Rameshbabu wrote: > On Tue, 22 Aug, 2023 11:12:28 +0200 Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > So, we discussed it this morning with Benjamin, and I think the culprit > > is that the uclogic driver will allocate a char array with devm_kzalloc > > in uclogic_input_configured() > > (https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/hid/hid-uclogic-core.c#L149), > > and will assign input_dev->name to that pointer. > > > > When the device is removed, the devm-allocated array is freed, and the > > input framework will send a uevent in input_dev_uevent() using the > > input_dev->name field: > > > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/input/input.c#L1688 > > > > So it's a classic dangling pointer situation. > > > > And even though it was revealed by that patch, I think the issue is > > unrelated. The fundamental issue seems to be that the usage of devm in > > that situation is wrong. > > > > input_dev->name is accessed by input_dev_uevent, which for KOBJ_UNBIND > > and KOBJ_REMOVE will be called after remove. > > > > For example, in __device_release_driver() (with the driver remove hook > > being called in device_remove() and devres_release_all() being called in > > device_unbind_cleanup()): > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/base/dd.c#L1278 > > > > So, it looks to me that, with or without the patch we merged recently, > > the core has always sent uevent after device-managed resources were > > freed. Thus, the uclogic (and any other input driver) was wrong in > > allocating its input_dev name with devm_kzalloc (or the phys and uniq > > fields in that struct). > > > > Note that freeing input_dev->name in remove would have been just as bad. > > > > Looking at the code quickly, at least hid-playstation, > > hid-nvidia-shield, hid-logitech-hidpp, mms114 and tsc200x seem to be > > affected by the same issue. > > I agree with this analysis overall. At least in hid-nvidia-shield, I can > not use devm for allocating the input name string and explicitly free it > after calling input_unregister_device. In this scenario, the name string > would have been freed explicitly after input_put_device was called > (since the input device is not devres managed). input_put_device would > drop the reference count to zero and the device would be cleaned up at > that point triggering KOBJ_REMOVE and firing off that final > input_dev_uevent. > > I think this can be done for a number of the drivers as a workaround > till this issue is properly resolved. If this seems appropriate, I can > send out a series later in the day. This is just a workaround till the > discussion below converges (which I am interested in). I'm sorry, I don't know the input framework well enough to understand what you had in mind exactly. Could you send a patch with your suggestion for the hid-nvidia-shield so we can discuss this further? That being said, I think that the current design around name, phys and uniq is fairly treacherous to drivers and we should aim for a solution that prevents that issue from being possible at all. I was inclined to go for a char array for each to get rid of the pointer entirely, but Benjamin raised some concerns over the structure size so it's probably not a great solution. Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature