On 31/07/2023 07:37, Fenglin Wu wrote: > Add compatible string 'qcom,spmi-vib-gen2' to support vibrator module > inside PMI632, PMI7250B, PM7325B, PM7550BA. > > Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml > index c8832cd0d7da..4a2319fc1e3f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8xxx-vib.yaml > @@ -11,10 +11,18 @@ maintainers: > > properties: > compatible: > - enum: > - - qcom,pm8058-vib > - - qcom,pm8916-vib > - - qcom,pm8921-vib > + oneOf: > + - enum: > + - qcom,pm8058-vib > + - qcom,pm8916-vib > + - qcom,pm8921-vib > + - items: > + - enum: > + - qcom,pmi632-vib > + - qcom,pm7250b-vib > + - qcom,pm7325b-vib > + - qcom,pm7550b-vib > + - const: qcom,spmi-vib-gen2 This does not seem to implement my comment: "Entirely remove qcom,spmi-vib-gen2 and qcom,spmi-vib-gen1. Use device specific compatibles names only. As fallback and as first compatible." It's nice to respond that you disagree with it. Therefore, I am not going to Ack it. Best regards, Krzysztof
