On 05.08.23 15:09, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 8/4/23 17:26, August Wikerfors wrote: >> On 2023-07-30 06:49, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >>> Lo! >>> >>> On 30.07.23 04:41, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >>>> >>>> I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it: >>>> >>>>> On a kernel 6.4.5 and less, the keyboard is working fine. >>>>> >>>>> Beginning with 6.5 rc1 and 6.4.7 any key don't respond. >>> >>> That is a AMD Ryzen Laptop. And if that really started from >>> v6.4.6..v6.4.7 then I guess there is a decent chance that this is caused >>> by ```ACPI: resource: Remove "Zen" specific match and quirks``` from >>> Mario. Hence adding him to the list of recipients. >> >> Confirmed now, see https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217726#c9 >> >> #regzbot introduced: a9c4a912b7dc7ff922d4b9261160c001558f9755 > > We just have received 2 bug reports for Fedora which I believe are also > this issue (not confirmed yet): > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229165 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229317 Interesting, thx for sharing! I just asked people there to share dmidecode and acpidump to check if those are different machines. > I'm going to create a Fedora 6.4.y test-kernel with a9c4a912b7dc7ff > reverted. > > IMHO we really should revert a9c4a912b7dc7ff upstream, > at least for the 6.4.y series That is unlikely to be a option, because as explained in Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst Greg's stance in cases like this usually is "fix it in mainline, and then I'll pick up the fix". > where it seems to be doing more harm then good. > > And propably also for 6.5-rc# for now until we figure out > a better solution. Hmmm, looks like the issue and the fix for one of the machines[1] didn't make much progress this week, so I tend to agree. Mario? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230728191408.18141-1-mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx/ Ciao, Thorsten
