On 06.06.23 04:36, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 01:24:25PM +0200, Malte Starostik wrote: >> Hello, >> >> chiming in here as I'm experiencing what looks like the exact same issue, also >> on a Lenovo Z13 notebook, also on Arch: >> Oops during startup in task udev-worker followed by udev-worker blocking all >> attempts to suspend or cleanly shutdown/reboot the machine - in fact I first >> noticed because the machine surprised with repeatedly running out of battery >> after it had supposedly been in standby but couldn't. Only then I noticed the >> error on boot. >> >> bisect result: >> 904e28c6de083fa4834cdbd0026470ddc30676fc is the first bad commit >> commit 904e28c6de083fa4834cdbd0026470ddc30676fc >> Merge: a738688177dc 2f7f4efb9411 >> Author: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Wed Feb 22 10:44:31 2023 +0100 >> >> Merge branch 'for-6.3/hid-bpf' into for-linus > > Hmm, seems like bad bisect (bisected to HID-BPF which IMO isn't related > to amd_sfh). Can you repeat the bisection? Well, amd_sfh afaics apparently interacts with HID (see trace earlier in the thread), so it's not that far away. But it's a merge commit, which is possible, but doesn't happen every day. So a recheck might really be a good idea. > Anyway, tl;dr: > >> A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post >> Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? > [...] BTW, I'm not sure if this really is helpful. Teaching this to upcoming kernel developers is definitely worth it, but I wonder if pushing this on all reporters might do more harm than good. I also wonder if asking them a bit more kindly might be wiser (e.g. instead of "Anyway, tl;dr:" something like "BTW, please do not top-post:" or something like that maybe). Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.