On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:55:14AM +0300, Dana Elfassy wrote:
> Currently input_grab_device() isn't covered by any tests
> Thus, adding a test to cover the cases:
> 1. The device is grabbed successfully
> 2. Trying to grab a device that is already grabbed by another input
> handle
>
> Signed-off-by: Dana Elfassy <dangel101@xxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> 1. Retrieve test_handle variable to try and grab the device that's
> currently grabbed by another handle
> 2. Add verification that test_handle can indeed grab the device after
> it's released by the handle that grabbed it
> 3. Remove duplicated call for input_grab_device() in KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE()
> functions
> Changes in v2:
> - Use input_put_device() to decrement the refcount increased by get().
> - Remove unnecessary struct input_handle test_handle variable.
>
> drivers/input/tests/input_test.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/tests/input_test.c b/drivers/input/tests/input_test.c
> index 25bbf51b5c87..1939cc12bae0 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/tests/input_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/tests/input_test.c
> @@ -124,10 +124,42 @@ static void input_test_match_device_id(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, input_match_device_id(input_dev, &id));
> }
>
> +static void input_test_grab(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct input_dev *input_dev = test->priv;
> + struct input_handle test_handle;
> + struct input_handler handler;
> + struct input_handle handle;
> + struct input_device_id id;
> + int res;
> +
> + handler.name = "handler";
> + handler.id_table = &id;
> +
> + handle.dev = input_get_device(input_dev);
> + handle.name = dev_name(&input_dev->dev);
> + handle.handler = &handler;
> + res = input_grab_device(&handle);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, res == 0);
Could you please tell me why you are using KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE() here but
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ() below?
> +
> + test_handle.dev = input_get_device(input_dev);
> + test_handle.name = dev_name(&input_dev->dev);
> + test_handle.handler = &handler;
> + res = input_grab_device(&test_handle);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, res, -EBUSY);
> +
> + input_release_device(&handle);
> + input_put_device(input_dev);
> + res = input_grab_device(&test_handle);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, res == 0);
> + input_put_device(input_dev);
> +}
> +
> static struct kunit_case input_tests[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(input_test_polling),
> KUNIT_CASE(input_test_timestamp),
> KUNIT_CASE(input_test_match_device_id),
> + KUNIT_CASE(input_test_grab),
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
>
> --
> 2.40.1
>
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
