On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 12:14 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 02:17:06PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Mar 06 2023, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > It is commonly accepted in the ACPI world that the names do not carry
> > meaning AFAICT, and so I think I agree with Andy's initial comment
> > regarding using indexes, not names to also fetch the I2C and GPIO nodes.
> > You can probably have a fallback mechanism for when "i2c" is not
> > present, or simply check if you are in DT or not and use the names only
> > if we are in DT.
>
> The solution is to provide in the main node the list of cell names, that way
> you will always know the indices:
>
> Device (DEV) {
> _DSD
> "cell-names" { "i2c", "gpio" } // index of the name is the
> // index of the cell
>
> Device (I2C0) {
> }
>
> Device (GPI0) {
> }
> }
>
> Problem solved.
>
Just to make sure I'm understanding you correctly:
Are you proposing that specifically this driver directly reads "cell-names"
from the ACPI DSD to implement this indexing? Or are you proposing a
kernel-wide mechanism of "overriding" a fwnode name with ACPI?
(assuming this doesn't exist already, and I'm not just missing it in
the kernel source)
Or are you proposing something else entirely?
(apologies if this should be obvious -- throwing up the ACPI newbie
card again here :) )
In any case, would this be something I should post to the email chain
with DT and ACPI
folks for opinions before I start to implement it?
Thanks,
Danny Kaehn
