On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 07:53:20AM -0600, Daniel Kaehn wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:17 AM Benjamin Tissoires > <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > More and more, after actually seeing and working with ACPI, I suspect that > you both are right. Maybe (hopefully) though, there is some unified way that can > be made to do this, so that individual drivers won't have to directly code for / > be aware of the differences in the firmware languages (at least, that seemed > to be the intent of the fw_node/device api in the first place). Maybe a > `device_get_child_by_name_or_index` (terribly long name) sort of function > might fill in that gap? Look also at the solution I proposed in response to Benjamin in my previous email. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
