On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:09 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023, at 23:35, andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 10:50:40PM +0100, Linus Walleij kirjoitti: > > >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 4:14 PM Andy Shevchenko > > >> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers et al., > > >> > > > >> > Combined series to clean up headers in the GPIO library and drivers. > > >> > Along with it, drop a few unused legacy APIs. > > >> > > > >> > This tag is immutable, enjoy! > > >> > > >> Thanks for coordinating and getting this sorted and tested Andy, perfect > > >> job as always! > > > > > > You're welcome! > > > > > >> > intel-gpio for v6.3-1 > > >> > > >> But I think you mean it for v6.4? > > > > > > Well, techically speaking it didn't make v6.3-rc1 due to cross-dependencies. > > > Starting from it it may be applied to v6.3 or to v6.4. > > > > > > Up to you and Bart, but I prefer not to rebrand the tag, if it's an option. > > > > I think it was clear that this would not make it into 6.3 after > > the decision to rebase on top of 6.3-rc1. However, the tag name > > and description both look like they make sense for 6.4 the way > > you wrote them. > > Okay, I will rre-tag this. Now it's tagged as intel-gpio-v6.4-1. Should I send a new PR? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
