On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 09:24:18AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:26:04PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 02:39:50PM +0800, Joe Wu wrote: > > > Add 3 extra buttons: 'brightness up', 'brightness down' > > > and 'screen lock' to support monitor manipulating function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joe Wu <joewu@xxxxxxx> > > > > From: line does not match the signed-off-by (and is an invalid email > > address...) > > What do you mean "it's an invalid email address"? You can definitely > send emails there... I prefer people not to use Google partner domain > accounts in the hope that their employment might outlast their > involvement in Google projects, but that is it. I was told that this was not a valid email address to send and receive emails from, and was only an email alias given to companies to interact with Google through their gerrit systems. If that is incorrect, I'll not complain about this anymore, but someone needs to please verify this for me before I do so :) But even if it is valid, should we accept it as a way to get in contact with the original submitter over time? > I think if we ask people to stick "From: <whatever the company address > is" in the body of the patch we can ignore the difference between sender > address and from/signed-off-by when they use partner domain accounts. If > anything, such accounts have better vetting than a random gmail or other > free email service account some vendors have to create to be able to > send a plain-text emails that we require. I mean, we have > "Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <lkml@xxxxxxx>" present in our git > history and nobody bats an eye... Oh lots of people "batted an eye" about that one, I've had too many meetings with lawyers about that, which is one reason I now verify email addresses like I did here. thanks, greg k-h
